SCRIBING: Why The Left's Global Warming Agenda is Flat Out Wrong

There's some question in the blogosphere about who authored/narrated this video ... is the author/narrator in fact Roy Spencer? ... neither at the beginning or end of the video is any information given.

The narrator is in fact Roy W. Spencer. The text was adapted from his E-Book/Broadside:  "The Bad Science and Bad Policy of Obama's Global Warming Agenda" 

I am very pleased with funding this production. It is going virtual quickly.

This was great! My only contention is the title. The video doesn't really come to the conclusion that the left is "flat out wrong". It does something better. It describes the twisted and uncertain nature of the logic and maybe some of the underlying motivations of the movement. I'd use a title like "There's more to Global Warming than the end of the world" - tantalizing, but not so polarizing. The left uses emotion to promote it's ideas - usually envy, fear and the need for revenge against a villain. Consider how nearly any authority who questions AGW is accused of being a 'shill for the oil industry'. Contempt for 'big oil' has been so propagandized into my generation that you don't even need evidence. It's like being accusing of being a child molester. Even if you can prove you're not, the damage is done and too many will continue to suspect and most won't listen to you about anything. An effective, but lazy and moral bankrupt tactic of winning debate. What I like about this video is that it subtly points out possible stains on the perfect, pure and noble white robes worn by the heroes of the left. Nobody likes being a sucker - I think this is our best weapon. Present the facts with suggestions that their gods may not be perfect and they'll look at the evidence a bit closer and begin to lose their faith.

GREAT clip!! Someone also needs to do something which includes the Milankovitch Cycles (Obliquity, Eccentricity and Precession)and how each in combination with the other, affect earth's absorption of heat, amount of ice at polar caps, distance heat must travel from the sun to the planet, etc. These are variables which cannot be influenced by mankind though I suppose Obama, Inc. might expect us to run from one side of the earth to the other and around in circles to alter the tilt, rotation, orbit and wobble of the earth ... although I don't know how the Democrats expect us to change the gravitational pull of Jupiter and Saturn ... I suppose god-Obama figures he's got the cosmos covered, but is dealing first with our terrible storms (per Berlin speech) and finding a way to enforce a tax on human respiration.

I didn't know where to find this info then kaobom it was here.